Mule applications that implement a number of REST APIs are deployed to their own subnet
that is inaccessible from outside the organization.
External business-partners need to access these APIs, which are only allowed to be
invoked from a separate subnet dedicated to partners - called Partner-subnet. This subnet
is accessible from the public internet, which allows these external partners to reach it.
Anypoint Platform and Mule runtimes are already deployed in Partner-subnet. These Mule
runtimes can already access the APIs.
What is the most resource-efficient solution to comply with these requirements, while
having the least impact on other applications that are currently using the APIs?
A.
Implement (or generate) an API proxy Mule application for each of the APIs, then deploy the API proxies to the Mule runtimes
B.
Redeploy the API implementations to the same servers running the Mule runtimes
C.
Add an additional endpoint to each API for partner-enablement consumption
D.
Duplicate the APIs as Mule applications, then deploy them to the Mule runtimes
Implement (or generate) an API proxy Mule application for each of the APIs, then deploy the API proxies to the Mule runtimes
Select the correct Owner-Layer combinations from below options
A.
1. App Developers owns and focuses on Experience Layer APIs
2. Central IT owns and focuses on Process Layer APIs
3. LOB IT owns and focuses on System Layer APIs
B.
1. Central IT owns and focuses on Experience Layer APIs
2. LOB IT owns and focuses on Process Layer APIs
3. App Developers owns and focuses on System Layer APIs
C.
1. App Developers owns and focuses on Experience Layer APIs
2. LOB IT owns and focuses on Process Layer APIs
3. Central IT owns and focuses on System Layer APIs
1. App Developers owns and focuses on Experience Layer APIs
2. LOB IT owns and focuses on Process Layer APIs
3. Central IT owns and focuses on System Layer APIs
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer:
1. App Developers owns and focuses on Experience Layer APIs
2. LOB IT owns and focuses on Process Layer APIs
3. Central IT owns and focuses on System Layer APIs
References:
https://blogs.mulesoft.com/biz/api/experience-api-ownership/
https://blogs.mulesoft.com/biz/api/process-api-ownership/
https://blogs.mulesoft.com/biz/api/system-api-ownership
A large organization with an experienced central IT department is getting started using MuleSoft. There is a project to connect a siloed back-end system to a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. The Center for Enablement is coaching them to use API-led connectivity. What action would support the creation of an application network using API-led connectivity?
A. Invite the business analyst to create a business process model to specify the canonical data model between the two systems
B. Determine if the new CRM system supports the creation of custom: REST APIs, establishes 4 private network with CloudHub, and supports GAuth 2.0 authentication
C. To expedite this project, central IT should extend the CRM system and back-end systems to connect to one another using built in integration interfaces
D. Create a System API to unlock the data on the back-end system using a REST API
Explanation:
For an organization starting with API-led connectivity to integrate a siloed
back-end system with a new CRM, the following approach aligns with best practices and
MuleSoft’s Center for Enablement (C4E) guidance:
API-led Connectivity: This model organizes APIs into distinct layers (System,
Process, and Experience) to improve reusability, modularity, and manageability.
When using CloudHub with the Shared Load Balancer, what is managed EXCLUSIVELY
by the API implementation (the Mule application) and NOT by Anypoint Platform?
A.
The assignment of each HTTP request to a particular CloudHub worker
B.
The logging configuration that enables log entries to be visible in Runtime Manager
C.
The SSL certificates used by the API implementation to expose HTTPS endpoints
D.
The number of DNS entries allocated to the API implementation
The SSL certificates used by the API implementation to expose HTTPS endpoints
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: The SSL certificates used by the API implementation to expose HTTPS
endpoints
*****************************************
>> The assignment of each HTTP request to a particular CloudHub worker is taken care by
Anypoint Platform itself. We need not manage it explicitly in the API implementation and in
fact we CANNOT manage it in the API implementation.
>> The logging configuration that enables log entries to be visible in Runtime Manager is
ALWAYS managed in the API implementation and NOT just for SLB. So this is not
something we do EXCLUSIVELY when using SLB.
>> We DO NOT manage the number of DNS entries allocated to the API implementation
inside the code. Anypoint Platform takes care of this.
It is the SSL certificates used by the API implementation to expose HTTPS endpoints that
is to be managed EXCLUSIVELY by the API implementation. Anypoint Platform does NOT
do this when using SLBs.
The asset version 2.0.0 of the Order API is successfully published in Exchange and configured in API Manager with the Autodiscovery API ID correctly linked to the API implementation, A new GET method is added to the existing API specification, and after updates, the asset version of the Order API is 2.0.1. What happens to the Autodiscovery API ID when the new asset version is updated in API Manager?
A. The API ID changes, but no changes are needed to the API implementation for the new asset version in the API Autediscovery global element because the API ID is automatically updated
B. The APL ID changes, so the API implementation must be updated with the latest API ID for the new asset version in the API Autodiscovery global element
C. The APLID does not change, so no changes to the APT implementation are needed for the new asset version in the API Autodiscovery global element
D. The APL ID does not change, but the API implementation must be updated in the AP] Autodiscovery global element to indicate the new asset version 2.0.4
Explanation:
Understanding API Autodiscovery in MuleSoft:
Effect of Asset Version Update on API Autodiscovery:
Evaluating the Options:
True or False. We should always make sure that the APIs being designed and developed are self-servable even if it needs more man-day effort and resources.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
TRUE
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: TRUE
*****************************************
>> As per MuleSoft proposed IT Operating Model, designing APIs and making sure that
they are discoverable and self-servable is VERY VERY IMPORTANT and decides the
success of an API and its application network.
A retail company with thousands of stores has an API to receive data about purchases and
insert it into a single database. Each individual store sends a batch of purchase data to the
API about every 30 minutes. The API implementation uses a database bulk insert
command to submit all the purchase data to a database using a custom JDBC driver
provided by a data analytics solution provider. The API implementation is deployed to a
single CloudHub worker. The JDBC driver processes the data into a set of several
temporary disk files on the CloudHub worker, and then the data is sent to an analytics
engine using a proprietary protocol. This process usually takes less than a few minutes.
Sometimes a request fails. In this case, the logs show a message from the JDBC driver
indicating an out-of-file-space message. When the request is resubmitted, it is successful.
What is the best way to try to resolve this throughput issue?
A.
se a CloudHub autoscaling policy to add CloudHub workers
B.
Use a CloudHub autoscaling policy to increase the size of the CloudHub worker
C.
Increase the size of the CloudHub worker(s)
D.
Increase the number of CloudHub workers
Increase the number of CloudHub workers
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: Increase the size of the CloudHub worker(s)
*****************************************
The key details that we can take out from the given scenario are:
>> API implementation uses a database bulk insert command to submit all the purchase
data to a database
>> JDBC driver processes the data into a set of several temporary disk files on the
CloudHub worker
>> Sometimes a request fails and the logs show a message indicating an out-of-file-space
message
Based on above details:
>> Both auto-scaling options does NOT help because we cannot set auto-scaling rules
based on error messages. Auto-scaling rules are kicked-off based on CPU/Memory usages
and not due to some given error or disk space issues.
>> Increasing the number of CloudHub workers also does NOT help here because the
reason for the failure is not due to performance aspects w.r.t CPU or Memory. It is due to
disk-space.
>> Moreover, the API is doing bulk insert to submit the received batch data. Which means,
all data is handled by ONE worker only at a time. So, the disk space issue should be
tackled on "per worker" basis. Having multiple workers does not help as the batch may still
fail on any worker when disk is out of space on that particular worker.
Therefore, the right way to deal this issue and resolve this is to increase the vCore size of
the worker so that a new worker with more disk space will be provisioned.
An API implementation returns three X-RateLimit-* HTTP response headers to a requesting API client. What type of information do these response headers indicate to the API client?
A.
The error codes that result from throttling
B.
A correlation ID that should be sent in the next request
C.
The HTTP response size
D.
The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation
The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation.
*****************************************
>> Reference: https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/rate-limiting-and-throttling-slabased-
policies#response-headers
| Page 1 out of 19 Pages |
Contact Us - Privacy Policy ... Copyright © - All Rights Reserved