Mulesoft MCPA-Level-1 Exam Questions

Say, there is a legacy CRM system called CRM-Z which is offering below functions:
1. Customer creation
2. Amend details of an existing customer
3. Retrieve details of a customer
4. Suspend a customer

A.

Implement a system API named customerManagement which has all the functionalities
wrapped in it as various operations/resources

B.

Implement different system APIs named createCustomer, amendCustomer,
retrieveCustomer and suspendCustomer as they are modular and has seperation of concerns

C.

Implement different system APIs named createCustomerInCRMZ,
amendCustomerInCRMZ, retrieveCustomerFromCRMZ and suspendCustomerInCRMZ as
they are modular and has seperation of concerns

B.

Implement different system APIs named createCustomer, amendCustomer,
retrieveCustomer and suspendCustomer as they are modular and has seperation of concerns

Correct Answer: Implement different system APIs named createCustomer,
amendCustomer, retrieveCustomer and suspendCustomer as they are modular and has
seperation of concerns
*****************************************
>> It is quite normal to have a single API and different Verb + Resource combinations.
However, this fits well for an Experience API or a Process API but not a best architecture
style for System APIs. So, option with just one customerManagement API is not the best
choice here.
>> The option with APIs in createCustomerInCRMZ format is next close choice w.r.t
modularization and less maintenance but the naming of APIs is directly coupled with the
legacy system. A better foreseen approach would be to name your APIs by abstracting the
backend system names as it allows seamless replacement/migration of any backend
system anytime. So, this is not the correct choice too.
>> createCustomer, amendCustomer, retrieveCustomer and suspendCustomer is the right
approach and is the best fit compared to other options as they are both modular and same
time got the names decoupled from backend system and it has covered all requirements a
System API needs.

What is true about automating interactions with Anypoint Platform using tools such as Anypoint Platform REST APIs, Anypoint CU, or the Mule Maven plugin?

A.

Access to Anypoint Platform APIs and Anypoint CU can be controlled separately through the roles and permissions in Anypoint Platform, so that specific users can get access to Anypoint CLI white others get access to the platform APIs

B.

Anypoint Platform APIs can ONLY automate interactions with CloudHub, while the Mule Maven plugin is required for deployment to customer-hosted Mule runtimes

C.

By default, the Anypoint CLI and Mule Maven plugin are NOT included in the Mule runtime, so are NOT available to be used by deployed Mule applications

D.

API policies can be applied to the Anypoint Platform APIs so that ONLY certain LOBs have access to specific functions

C.

By default, the Anypoint CLI and Mule Maven plugin are NOT included in the Mule runtime, so are NOT available to be used by deployed Mule applications

Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: By default, the Anypoint CLI and Mule Maven plugin are NOT included in
the Mule runtime, so are NOT available to be used by deployed Mule applications
*****************************************
>> We CANNOT apply API policies to the Anypoint Platform APIs like we can do on our
custom written API instances. So, option suggesting this is FALSE.
>> Anypoint Platform APIs can be used for automating interactions with both CloudHub
and customer-hosted Mule runtimes. Not JUST the CloudHub. So, option opposing this is
FALSE.
>> Mule Maven plugin is NOT mandatory for deployment to customer-hosted Mule
runtimes. It just helps your CI/CD to have smoother automation. But not a compulsory
requirement to deploy. So, option opposing this is FALSE.
>> We DO NOT have any such special roles and permissions on the platform to separately
control access for some users to have Anypoint CLI and others to have Anypoint Platform
APIs. With proper general roles/permissions (API Owner, Cloudhub Admin etc..), one can
use any of the options (Anypoint CLI or Platform APIs). So, option suggesting this is
FALSE.
Only TRUE statement given in the choices is that - Anypoint CLI and Mule Maven plugin
are NOT included in the Mule runtime, so are NOT available to be used by deployed Mule
applications.
Maven is part of Studio or you can use other Maven installation for development.
CLI is convenience only. It is one of many ways how to install app to the runtime.
These are definitely NOT part of anything except your process of deployment or
automation.

4A developer for a transportation organization is implementing exactly one processing functionality in a Reservation Mule application to process and store passenger records. This Reservation application will be deployed to multiple CloudHub workers/replicas. It is possible that several external systems could send duplicate passenger records to the Reservation application.
An appropriate storage mechanism must be selected to help the Reservation application process each passenger record exactly once as much as possible. The selected storage mechanism must be shared by all the CloudHub workers/replicas in order to synchronize the state information to assist attempting exactly once processing of each passenger record by the deployed Reservation Mule application.
Which type of simple storage mechanism in Anypoint Platform allows the Reservation Mule application to update and share data between the CloudHub workers/replicas exactly once, with minimal development effort?

A. Persistent Object Store

B. Runtime Fabric Object Store

C. Non-persistent Object Store

D. In-memory Mule Object Store

A. Persistent Object Store

A system API has a guaranteed SLA of 100 ms per request. The system API is deployed to a primary environment as well as to a disaster recovery (DR) environment, with different DNS names in each environment. An upstream process API invokes the system API and the main goal of this process API is to respond to client requests in the least possible time. In what order should the system APIs be invoked, and what changes should be made in order to speed up the response time for requests from the process API?

A. In parallel, invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment and the system API deployed to the DR environment, and ONLY use the first response

B. In parallel, invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment and the system API deployed to the DR environment using a scatter-gather configured with a timeout, and then merge the responses

C. Invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment, and if it fails, invoke the system API deployed to the DR environment

D. Invoke ONLY the system API deployed to the primary environment, and add timeout and retry logic to avoid intermittent failures

A. In parallel, invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment and the system API deployed to the DR environment, and ONLY use the first response

Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: In parallel, invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment
and the system API deployed to the DR environment, and ONLY use the first response.
*****************************************
>> The API requirement in the given scenario is to respond in least possible time.
>> The option that is suggesting to first try the API in primary environment and then
fallback to API in DR environment would result in successful response but NOT in least
possible time. So, this is NOT a right choice of implementation for given requirement.
>> Another option that is suggesting to ONLY invoke API in primary environment and to
add timeout and retries may also result in successful response upon retries but NOT in
least possible time. So, this is also NOT a right choice of implementation for given
requirement.
>> One more option that is suggesting to invoke API in primary environment and API in DR
environment in parallel using Scatter-Gather would result in wrong API response as it
would return merged results and moreover, Scatter-Gather does things in parallel which is
true but still completes its scope only on finishing all routes inside it. So again, NOT a right
choice of implementation for given requirement
The Correct choice is to invoke the API in primary environment and the API in DR
environment parallelly, and using ONLY the first response received from one of them

Refer to the exhibit.

Three business processes need to be implemented, and the implementations need to communicate with several different SaaS applications.
These processes are owned by separate (siloed) LOBs and are mainly independent of each other, but do share a few business entities. Each LOB has one development team and their own budget.
In this organizational context, what is the most effective approach to choose the API data models for the APIs that will implement these business processes with minimal redundancy of the data models?
A) Build several Bounded Context Data Models that align with coherent parts of the business processes and the definitions of associated business entities.
B) Build distinct data models for each API to follow established micro-services and Agile API-centric practices
C) Build all API data models using XML schema to drive consistency and reuse across the organization
D) Build one centralized Canonical Data Model (Enterprise Data Model) that unifies all the data types from all three business processes, ensuring the data model is consistent and non-redundant

A. Option A

B. Option B

C. Option C

D. Option D

A. Option A

Explanation:

Correct Answer: Build several Bounded Context Data Models that align with coherent parts of the business processes and the definitions of associated business entities.

The options w.r.t building API data models using XML schema/ Agile API-centric practices are irrelevant to the scenario given in the question. So these two are INVALID.
Building EDM (Enterprise Data Model) is not feasible or right fit for this scenario as the teams and LOBs work in silo and they all have different initiatives, budget etc.. Building EDM needs intensive coordination among all the team which evidently seems not possible in this scenario.

So, the right fit for this scenario is to build several Bounded Context Data Models that align with coherent parts of the business processes and the definitions of associated business entities.

An organization uses various cloud-based SaaS systems and multiple on-premises
systems. The on-premises systems are an important part of the organization's application
network and can only be accessed from within the organization's intranet.
What is the best way to configure and use Anypoint Platform to support integrations with
both the cloud-based SaaS systems and on-premises systems?
A) Use CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes in an Anypoint VPC managed by Anypoint
Platform Private Cloud Edition control plane

A.

Option A

B.

Option B

C.

Option C

D.

Option D

B.

Option B

Explanation: •Explanation
Correct Answer: Use a combination of CloudHub-deployed and manually provisioned onpremises
Mule runtimes managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Platform control plane.
*****************************************
Key details to be taken from the given scenario:
>> Organization uses BOTH cloud-based and on-premises systems
>> On-premises systems can only be accessed from within the organization's intranet
Let us evaluate the given choices based on above key details:
>> CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes can ONLY be controlled using MuleSoft-hosted
control plane. We CANNOT use Private Cloud Edition's control plane to control CloudHub
Mule Runtimes. So, option suggesting this is INVALID
>> Using CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes in the shared worker cloud managed by the
MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform is completely IRRELEVANT to given scenario and silly
choice. So, option suggesting this is INVALID
>> Using an on-premises installation of Mule runtimes that are completely isolated with NO
external network access, managed by the Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition control
plane would work for On-premises integrations. However, with NO external access,
integrations cannot be done to SaaS-based apps. Moreover CloudHub-hosted apps are
best-fit for integrating with SaaS-based applications. So, option suggesting this is BEST
WAY.
The best way to configure and use Anypoint Platform to support these mixed/hybrid
integrations is to use a combination of CloudHub-deployed and manually provisioned onpremises
Mule runtimes managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Platform control plane.

What is true about where an API policy is defined in Anypoint Platform and how it is then applied to API instances?

A.

The API policy Is defined In Runtime Manager as part of the API deployment to a Mule
runtime, and then ONLY applied to the specific API Instance

B.

The API policy Is defined In API Manager for a specific API Instance, and then ONLY
applied to the specific API instance

C.

The API policy Is defined in API Manager and then automatically applied to ALL API instances

D.

The API policy is defined in API Manager, and then applied to ALL API instances in the
specified environment

B.

The API policy Is defined In API Manager for a specific API Instance, and then ONLY
applied to the specific API instance

Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: The API policy is defined in API Manager for a specific API instance, and
then ONLY applied to the specific API instance.
*****************************************
>> Once our API specifications are ready and published to Exchange, we need to visit API
Manager and register an API instance for each API.
>> API Manager is the place where management of API aspects takes place like
addressing NFRs by enforcing policies on them.
>> We can create multiple instances for a same API and manage them differently for
different purposes.
>> One instance can have a set of API policies applied and another instance of same API
can have different set of policies applied for some other purpose.
>> These APIs and their instances are defined PER environment basis. So, one need to
manage them seperately in each environment.
>> We can ensure that same configuration of API instances (SLAs, Policies etc..) gets
promoted when promoting to higher environments using platform feature. But this is
optional only. Still one can change them per environment basis if they have to.
>> Runtime Manager is the place to manage API Implementations and their Mule Runtimes
but NOT APIs itself. Though API policies gets executed in Mule Runtimes, We CANNOT
enforce API policies in Runtime Manager. We would need to do that via API Manager only
for a cherry picked instance in an environment.
So, based on these facts, right statement in the given choices is - "The API policy is
defined in API Manager for a specific API instance, and then ONLY applied to the specific
API instance".
Reference: https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/latest-overview-concept

True or False. We should always make sure that the APIs being designed and developed are self-servable even if it needs more man-day effort and resources.

A.

FALSE

B.

TRUE

B.

TRUE

Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: TRUE
*****************************************
>> As per MuleSoft proposed IT Operating Model, designing APIs and making sure that
they are discoverable and self-servable is VERY VERY IMPORTANT and decides the
success of an API and its application network.