Mulesoft MCPA-Level-1 Exam Questions

151 Questions


Updation Date : 15-Dec-2025



Mulesoft MCPA-Level-1 exam questions feature realistic, exam-like questions that cover all key topics with detailed explanations. You’ll identify your strengths and weaknesses, allowing you to focus your study efforts effectively. By practicing with our MCPA-Level-1 practice test, you’ll gain the knowledge, speed, and confidence needed to pass the Mulesoft exam on your first attempt.

Why leave your success to chance? Our Mulesoft MCPA-Level-1 dumps are your ultimate guide to passing the exam on your first try!

A REST API is being designed to implement a Mule application.
What standard interface definition language can be used to define REST APIs?


A.

Web Service Definition Language(WSDL)


B.

OpenAPI Specification (OAS)


C.

YAML


D.

AsyncAPI Specification





B.
  

OpenAPI Specification (OAS)



Which scenario is suited for MUnit tests instead of integration tests?


A. For read-only interactions to any dependencies (such as other web APIs)


B. When testing does not require knowledge of implementation details


C. When no mocking is permissible


D. For tests that are implemented using SoapUI





A.
  For read-only interactions to any dependencies (such as other web APIs)

Explanation:
MUnit is MuleSoft’s testing framework for creating and running automated tests within Anypoint Studio. It is specifically designed for unit testing Mule applications and is best suited when testing doesn’t require understanding the inner workings or implementation details of the components being tested.

  • Ideal Use Cases for MUnit:
  • Why Option B is Correct:
  • Explanation of Incorrect Options:
References:
For more on MUnit best practices, refer to MuleSoft’s MUnit documentation.

Refer to the exhibit.

what is true when using customer-hosted Mule runtimes with the MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform control plane (hybrid deployment)?


A.

Anypoint Runtime Manager initiates a network connection to a Mule runtime in order to deploy Mule applications


B.

The MuleSoft-hosted Shared Load Balancer can be used to load balance API
invocations to the Mule runtimes


C.

API implementations can run successfully in customer-hosted Mule runtimes, even when they are unable to communicate with the control plane


D.

Anypoint Runtime Manager automatically ensures HA in the control plane by creating a new Mule runtime instance in case of a node failure





C.
  

API implementations can run successfully in customer-hosted Mule runtimes, even when they are unable to communicate with the control plane



Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: API implementations can run successfully in customer-hosted Mule
runtimes, even when they are unable to communicate with the control plane.
*****************************************
>> We CANNOT use Shared Load balancer to load balance APIs on customer hosted
runtimes

A company has started to create an application network and is now planning to implement a Center for Enablement (C4E) organizational model. What key factor would lead the company to decide upon a federated rather than a centralized C4E?


A.

When there are a large number of existing common assets shared by development teams


B.

When various teams responsible for creating APIs are new to integration and hence need extensive training


C.

When development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups


D.

When the majority of the applications in the application network are cloud based





C.
  

When development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups



Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: When development is already organized into several independent
initiatives or groups
*****************************************
>> It would require lot of process effort in an organization to have a single C4E team
coordinating with multiple already organized development teams which are into several
independent initiatives. A single C4E works well with different teams having at least a
common initiative. So, in this scenario, federated C4E works well instead of centralized
C4E.

Refer to the exhibit.

A developer is building a client application to invoke an API deployed to the STAGING
environment that is governed by a client ID enforcement policy.
What is required to successfully invoke the API?


A.

The client ID and secret for the Anypoint Platform account owning the API in the STAGING environment


B.

The client ID and secret for the Anypoint Platform account's STAGING environment


C.

The client ID and secret obtained from Anypoint Exchange for the API instance in the
STAGING environment


D.

A valid OAuth token obtained from Anypoint Platform and its associated client ID and
secret





C.
  

The client ID and secret obtained from Anypoint Exchange for the API instance in the
STAGING environment



Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: The client ID and secret obtained from Anypoint Exchange for the API
instance in the STAGING environment
*****************************************
>> We CANNOT use the client ID and secret of Anypoint Platform account or any individual
environments for accessing the APIs
>> As the type of policy that is enforced on the API in question is "Client ID Enforcment
Policy", OAuth token based access won't work.
Right way to access the API is to use the client ID and secret obtained from Anypoint
Exchange for the API instance in a particular environment we want to work on.
References:
Managing API instance Contracts on API Manager
https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/1.x/request-access-to-api-task
https://docs.mulesoft.com/exchange/to-request-access
https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/policy-mule3-client-id-based-policies

An organization has created an API-led architecture that uses various API layers to integrate mobile clients with a backend system. The backend system consists of a number of specialized components and can be accessed via a REST API. The process and
experience APIs share the same bounded-context model that is different from the backend
data model. What additional canonical models, bounded-context models, or anti-corruption
layers are best added to this architecture to help process data consumed from the backend
system?


A.

Create a bounded-context model for every layer and overlap them when the boundary
contexts overlap, letting API developers know about the differences between upstream and
downstream data models


B.

Create a canonical model that combines the backend and API-led models to simplify
and unify data models, and minimize data transformations.


C.

Create a bounded-context model for the system layer to closely match the backend data
model, and add an anti-corruption layer to let the different bounded contexts cooperate
across the system and process layers


D.

Create an anti-corruption layer for every API to perform transformation for every data
model to match each other, and let data simply travel between APIs to avoid the complexity
and overhead of building canonical models





C.
  

Create a bounded-context model for the system layer to closely match the backend data
model, and add an anti-corruption layer to let the different bounded contexts cooperate
across the system and process layers



Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: Create a bounded-context model for the system layer to closely match the
backend data model, and add an anti-corruption layer to let the different bounded contexts
cooperate across the system and process layers
*****************************************
>> Canonical models are not an option here as the organization has already put in efforts
and created bounded-context models for Experience and Process APIs.
>> Anti-corruption layers for ALL APIs is unnecessary and invalid because it is mentioned
that experience and process APIs share same bounded-context model. It is just the System
layer APIs that need to choose their approach now.
>> So, having an anti-corruption layer just between the process and system layers will work
well. Also to speed up the approach, system APIs can mimic the backend system data
model.

What are 4 important Platform Capabilities offered by Anypoint Platform?


A.

API Versioning, API Runtime Execution and Hosting, API Invocation, API Consumer Engagement


B.

API Design and Development, API Runtime Execution and Hosting, API Versioning, API
Deprecation


C.

API Design and Development, API Runtime Execution and Hosting, API Operations and
Management, API Consumer Engagement


D.

API Design and Development, API Deprecation, API Versioning, API Consumer
Engagement





C.
  

API Design and Development, API Runtime Execution and Hosting, API Operations and
Management, API Consumer Engagement



Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: API Design and Development, API Runtime Execution and Hosting, API
Operations and Management, API Consumer Engagement
*****************************************
>> API Design and Development - Anypoint Studio, Anypoint Design Center, Anypoint
Connectors
>> API Runtime Execution and Hosting - Mule Runtimes, CloudHub, Runtime Services
>> API Operations and Management - Anypoint API Manager, Anypoint Exchange
>> API Consumer Management - API Contracts, Public Portals, Anypoint Exchange, API
Notebooks

The Line of Business (LoB) of an eCommerce company is requesting a process that sends automated notifications via email every time a new order is processed through the customer's mobile application or through the internal company's web application. In the future, multiple notification channels may be added: for example, text messages and push notifications. What is the most effective API-led connectivity approach for the scenario described above?


A. Create one Experience API for the web application and one for the mobile application.
Create a Process API to orchestrate and retrieve the email template from = database.
Create a System API that sends the email using the Anypoint Connector for Email.
Create one Experience API for the web application and one for the mobile application.
Create a Process API to orchestrate and retrieve the email template from = database.
Create a System API that sends the email using the Anypoint Connector for Email.


B. Create one Experience API for the web application and one for the mobile application
Create a Process API to orchestrate, retrieve the email template from a database, and send the email using the Anypoint Connector for Email.


C. Create Experience APIs for both the web application and mobile application.
Create a Process API ta orchestrate, retrieve the email template from e database, and send the email using the Anypoint Connector for Email.


D. Create Experience APIs for both the web application and mobile application.
(Create 3 Process API to orchestrate and retrieve the email template from 2 database.
Create a System API that sends the email using the Anypoint Connector for Email.





A.
  Create one Experience API for the web application and one for the mobile application.
Create a Process API to orchestrate and retrieve the email template from = database.
Create a System API that sends the email using the Anypoint Connector for Email.
Create one Experience API for the web application and one for the mobile application.
Create a Process API to orchestrate and retrieve the email template from = database.
Create a System API that sends the email using the Anypoint Connector for Email.

Explanation:
In this scenario, the best approach to satisfy the API-led connectivity principles and support future scalability is:

  • Experience APIs:
  • Process API:
  • System API:
Why Option A is Correct:
This structure aligns with API-led connectivity principles by separating concerns across Experience, Process, and System layers. It provides flexibility for future notification channels and isolates each layer’s responsibility, making it easier to maintain and scale.
Explanation of Incorrect Options:
  • Option B lacks a separate System API for sending emails, which goes against the principle of isolating back-end functionality in System APIs.
  • Option C similarly lacks a dedicated System API, reducing flexibility and reusability.
  • Option D suggests creating multiple Process APIs for database retrieval, which adds unnecessary complexity and does not adhere to the single-orchestration principle typically followed in API-led design.


Page 1 out of 19 Pages