An API implementation is being designed that must invoke an Order API, which is known to
repeatedly experience downtime.
For this reason, a fallback API is to be called when the Order API is unavailable.
What approach to designing the invocation of the fallback API provides the best resilience?
A.
Search Anypoint Exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement
invocations to this fallback API in addition to the Order API
B.
Create a separate entry for the Order API in API Manager, and then invoke this API as a
fallback API if the primary Order API is unavailable
C.
Redirect client requests through an HTTP 307 Temporary Redirect status code to the
fallback API whenever the Order API is unavailable
D.
Set an option in the HTTP Requester component that invokes the Order API to instead
invoke a fallback API whenever an HTTP 4xx or 5xx response status code is returned from
the Order API
Search Anypoint Exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement
invocations to this fallback API in addition to the Order API
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: Search Anypoint exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then
implement invocations to this fallback API in addition to the order API
*****************************************
>> It is not ideal and good approach, until unless there is a pre-approved agreement with
the API clients that they will receive a HTTP 3xx temporary redirect status code and they
have to implement fallback logic their side to call another API.
>> Creating separate entry of same Order API in API manager would just create an
another instance of it on top of same API implementation. So, it does NO GOOD by using
clone od same API as a fallback API. Fallback API should be ideally a different API
implementation that is not same as primary one.
>> There is NO option currently provided by Anypoint HTTP Connector that allows us to
invoke a fallback API when we receive certain HTTP status codes in response.
The only statement TRUE in the given options is to Search Anypoint exchange for a
suitable existing fallback API, and then implement invocations to this fallback API in
addition to the order API.
Refer to the exhibit.
An organization uses one specific CloudHub (AWS) region for all CloudHub deployments.
How are CloudHub workers assigned to availability zones (AZs) when the organization's
Mule applications are deployed to CloudHub in that region?
A.
Workers belonging to a given environment are assigned to the same AZ within that region
B.
AZs are selected as part of the Mule application's deployment configuration
C.
Workers are randomly distributed across available AZs within that region
D.
An AZ is randomly selected for a Mule application, and all the Mule application's CloudHub workers are assigned to that one AZ
An AZ is randomly selected for a Mule application, and all the Mule application's CloudHub workers are assigned to that one AZ
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: Workers are randomly distributed across available AZs within that region.
*****************************************
>> Currently, we only have control to choose which AWS Region to choose but there is no
control at all using any configurations or deployment options to decide what Availability
Zone (AZ) to assign to what worker.
>> There are NO fixed or implicit rules on platform too w.r.t assignment of AZ to workers
based on environment or application.
>> They are completely assigned in random. However, cloudhub definitely ensures that
HA is achieved by assigning the workers to more than on AZ so that all workers are not
assigned to same AZ for same application.
: https://help.mulesoft.com/s/question/0D52T000051rqDj/one-cloudhub-aws-region-howcloudhub-
workers-are-assigned-to-availability-zones-azs-
Graphical user interface, application
Description automatically generated
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
An API implementation is deployed on a single worker on CloudHub and invoked by
external API clients (outside of CloudHub). How can an alert be set up that is guaranteed to
trigger AS SOON AS that API implementation stops responding to API invocations?
A.
Implement a heartbeat/health check within the API and invoke it from outside the Anypoint Platform and alert when the heartbeat does not respond
B.
Configure a "worker not responding" alert in Anypoint Runtime Manager
C.
Handle API invocation exceptions within the calling API client and raise an alert from that API client when the API Is unavailable
D.
Create an alert for when the API receives no requests within a specified time period
Configure a "worker not responding" alert in Anypoint Runtime Manager
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: Configure a “Worker not responding” alert in Anypoint Runtime Manager.
*****************************************
>> All the options eventually helps to generate the alert required when the application stops
responding.
>> However, handling exceptions within calling API and then raising alert from API client is
inappropriate and silly. There could be many API clients invoking the API implementation
and it is not ideal to have this setup consistently in all of them. Not a realistic way to do.
>> Implementing a health check/ heartbeat with in the API and calling from outside to
detmine the health sounds OK but needs extra setup for it and same time there are very
good chances of generating false alarms when there are any intermittent network issues
between external tool calling the health check API on API implementation. The API
implementation itself may not have any issues but due to some other factors some false
alarms may go out.
>> Creating an alert in API Manager when the API receives no requests within a specified
time period would actually generate realistic alerts but even here some false alarms may
go out when there are genuinely no requests from API clients.
The best and right way to achieve this requirement is to setup an alert on Runtime
Manager with a condition "Worker not responding". This would generate an alert
AS SOON AS the workers become unresponsive.
Refer to the exhibit.
A.
Option A
B.
Option B
C.
Option C
D.
Option D
Option A
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: Ask the Marketing Department to interact with a mocking implementation
of the API using the automatically generated API Console.
*****************************************
As per MuleSoft's IT Operating Model:
>> API consumers need NOT wait until the full API implementation is ready.
>> NO technical test-suites needs to be shared with end users to interact with APIs.
>> Anypoint Platform offers a mocking capability on all the published API specifications to
Anypoint Exchange which also will be rich in documentation covering all details of API
functionalities and working nature.
>> No needs of arranging days of workshops with end users for feedback.
API consumers can use Anypoint Exchange features on the platform and interact with the
API using its mocking feature. The feedback can be shared quickly on the same to
incorporate any changes.
What API policy would LEAST likely be applied to a Process API?
A.
Custom circuit breaker
B.
Client ID enforcement
C.
Rate limiting
D.
JSON threat protection
JSON threat protection
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: JSON threat protection
*****************************************
Fact: Technically, there are no restrictions on what policy can be applied in what layer. Any
policy can be applied on any layer API. However, context should also be considered
properly before blindly applying the policies on APIs.
That is why, this question asked for a policy that would LEAST likely be applied to a
Process API.
From the given options:
>> All policies except "JSON threat protection" can be applied without hesitation to the
APIs in Process tier.
>> JSON threat protection policy ideally fits for experience APIs to prevent suspicious
JSON payload coming from external API clients. This covers more of a security aspect by
trying to avoid possibly malicious and harmful JSON payloads from external clients calling
experience APIs.
As external API clients are NEVER allowed to call Process APIs directly and also these
kind of malicious and harmful JSON payloads are always stopped at experience API layer
only using this policy, it is LEAST LIKELY that this same policy is again applied on Process
Layer API.
Once an API Implementation is ready and the API is registered on API Manager, who should request the access to the API on Anypoint Exchange?
A.
None
B.
Both
C.
API Client
D.
API Consumer
API Consumer
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: API Consumer
*****************************************
>> API clients are piece of code or programs that use the client credentials of API
consumer but does not directly interact with Anypoint Exchange to get the access
>> API consumer is the one who should get registered and request access to API and then
API client needs to use those client credentials to hit the APIs
So, API consumer is the one who needs to request access on the API from Anypoint
Exchange
An API implementation returns three X-RateLimit-* HTTP response headers to a requesting API client. What type of information do these response headers indicate to the API client?
A.
The error codes that result from throttling
B.
A correlation ID that should be sent in the next request
C.
The HTTP response size
D.
The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation
The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation
Explanation: Explanation
Correct Answer: The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation.
*****************************************
>> Reference: https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/rate-limiting-and-throttling-slabased-
policies#response-headers
A customer wants to monitor and gain insights about the number of requests coming in a
given time period as well as to measure key performance indicators
(response times, CPU utilization, number of active APIs).
Which tool provides these data insights?
A. Anypoint Monitoring
B. APT Manager
C. Runtime Alerts
D. Functional Monitoring
| Page 1 out of 19 Pages |